Live calibration · updated continuously

When we say 80%, you can
check whether it happens 80% of the time.

This page scores AIM's regime-probability engine in public, with no edits. Every forecast is timestamped and locked before the outcome is known, then automatically graded ~20 trading days later against the regime that actually materialized. Hits and misses are both published. No chatbot can make this claim — verify it yourself below.

The declarative version of this headline — "it happens 80% of the time" — unlocks automatically at 50+ scored forecasts with calibration holding. Hold us to it.

Watch the gate re-earn itself: 975 of 30 matured forecasts (classifier v2.0.0)

gate closed

We found and fixed a flaw in our own regime classifier, so we reset the clock on ourselves: 362 pre-fix forecasts stay visible in the ledger below but are not counted toward the gate that must open before any probability reaches a decision screen. Nothing deleted, everything re-earned. Here's why →

Forecasts locked
1846
timestamped pre-outcome
Scored so far
975
509 maturing
Brier score
0.92
baseline 0.75
Hit rate
23.8%
modal regime realized

Reliability: what we said vs. what happened

Forecasts grouped by stated confidence. A calibrated system's two bars match (±10 pts). Buckets render their bars only at n≥10.

30–40%
we said37.4%
reality delivered19.5%
n=77off by 18 pts
40–50%
we said45.3%
reality delivered24.8%
n=399off by 20 pts
50–60%
we said54.3%
reality delivered26.6%
n=267off by 28 pts
60–70%
we said64.4%
reality delivered26.9%
n=119off by 38 pts
70–80%
we said73.9%
reality delivered13.2%
n=76off by 61 pts
80–90%
we said84.7%
reality delivered14.8%
n=27off by 70 pts
90–100%
we said92.1%
reality delivered10%
n=10off by 82 pts

Does the transition warning actually warn?

Avg risk before a regime change
44.7
n=743
Avg risk when regime held
44.9
n=232

A meaningful gap between these numbers means the early-warning signal carries real information.

Edge alert receipts — did the call hold?

When a watchlist alert says a ticker gained or lost a validated edge, the claim doesn't get to stand unexamined: ~14 days later the ticker is re-raced on fresh data and the outcome is published here — hit or miss, no mechanism to exclude a bad call.

Calls graded
65
5 still maturing
'Gained an edge' held
65.6%
still positive OOS ~2 weeks later
'Lost its edge' confirmed
69.7%
stayed edgeless on the re-race
WMT — we said it gained a validated edge on Oct 24 (OOS 0.184)re-raced 14d later: OOS 0.266 — ✓ edge held
HD — we said it gained a validated edge on Oct 17 (OOS 0.364)re-raced 14d later: OOS 0.301 — ✓ edge held
BCH-USD — we said it gained a validated edge on Oct 15 (OOS 0.141)re-raced 14d later: OOS 0.691 — ✓ edge held
DOT-USD — we said it gained a validated edge on Oct 15 (OOS 1.264)re-raced 14d later: OOS 1.086 — ✓ edge held
DASH-USD — we said it gained a validated edge on Oct 15 (OOS 1.548)re-raced 14d later: OOS 1.759 — ✓ edge held
COST — we said it gained a validated edge on Oct 15 (OOS 0.284)re-raced 14d later: OOS 0.192 — ✓ edge held
PG — we said it gained a validated edge on Oct 11 (OOS 0.235)re-raced 14d later: OOS 0.929 — ✓ edge held
TSLA — we said it gained a validated edge on Oct 5 (OOS 0.026)re-raced 14d later: OOS 0.076 — ✓ edge held
TSLA — we said it lost its edge on Oct 1 (OOS -0.154)re-raced 14d later: OOS 0.142 — ✗ edge came back
UNG — we said it lost its edge on Sep 29 (OOS -0.169)re-raced 14d later: OOS -0.374 — ✓ stayed edgeless — call confirmed
UNG — we said it gained a validated edge on Sep 26 (OOS 0.016)re-raced 14d later: OOS -0.084 — ✗ edge faded
NFLX — we said it lost its edge on Sep 24 (OOS -0.068)re-raced 15d later: OOS -1.259 — ✓ stayed edgeless — call confirmed

Edge anatomy — does the regime read predict survival?

Each graded "gained an edge" call is joined with the ticker's regime read at call time (from the hash-chained forecast ledger). If edges born in stable regimes survive their ~14-day re-race more often than edges born mid-transition, the regime read carries real information about edge durability — not just direction.

Born in a stable regime
0/1
n=1 — survival rates render at n≥5
Born mid-transition
83.3%
transition risk ≥ 40% · 5/6 held the re-race

How this works — and why it can't be faked

Locked before the outcome

Every regime read is written to the scoreboard the moment it's computed — with its full probability vector — and SHA-256-chained into the public ledger below.

Graded by rules, not opinion

After the horizon passes, the realized regime is labeled by the same deterministic rules, leak-free, and the forecast is Brier-scored.

Misses are published

The aggregates above include every scored forecast. There is no mechanism to exclude a bad call.

Gated before you see it in-app

Confidence numbers only appear inside the product once this public scoreboard proves they're honest.

Tamper-evident hash chain — the receipts

Every forecast is SHA-256-chained into a public ledger at lock time — currently 1800 links, tip 514e36e429e60236…. Recompute the chain yourself: any edit, deletion, or backfill after a link is written breaks every hash downstream. The exact verification recipe ships inside the file.

✓ Chain self-audited nightly — last verified Nov 11 · 1780 links recomputed clean

Download the ledger (JSON)

Trade with probabilities that answer to reality.

Backtests, regime intelligence, and risk management — all held to the same standard as this page.

Start free

Regime probabilities are statistical classifications of historical price behavior — not investment advice or price targets. Data updated Thu, 12 Nov 2026 23:05:44 GMT · cached 5 min.